Hello,
I've explained the problem at https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4115 This is my first patch to OpenWRT so please be lenient. The 160-stack-protector.patch deletes the section in configure of cups which switches on the stack-protector. In the Makefile the css files are missing. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kempken <inf23@web.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/packages@13044 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
This commit is contained in:
parent
980e56bfbb
commit
ba1b395ff7
62
net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch
Normal file
62
net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
--- cups-1.3.7/configure.old 2008-10-19 23:29:10.000000000 +0200
|
||||
+++ cups-1.3.7/configure 2008-10-19 23:31:10.000000000 +0200
|
||||
@@ -10115,59 +10115,6 @@
|
||||
OPTIM="-fPIC $OPTIM"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
- # The -fstack-protector option is available with some versions of
|
||||
- # GCC and adds "stack canaries" which detect when the return address
|
||||
- # has been overwritten, preventing many types of exploit attacks.
|
||||
- { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking if GCC supports -fstack-protector" >&5
|
||||
-echo $ECHO_N "checking if GCC supports -fstack-protector... $ECHO_C" >&6; }
|
||||
- OLDCFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
|
||||
- CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fstack-protector"
|
||||
- cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
|
||||
-/* confdefs.h. */
|
||||
-_ACEOF
|
||||
-cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
|
||||
-cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
|
||||
-/* end confdefs.h. */
|
||||
-
|
||||
-int
|
||||
-main ()
|
||||
-{
|
||||
-
|
||||
- ;
|
||||
- return 0;
|
||||
-}
|
||||
-_ACEOF
|
||||
-rm -f conftest.$ac_objext
|
||||
-if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"
|
||||
-case "(($ac_try" in
|
||||
- *\"* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;
|
||||
- *) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;
|
||||
-esac
|
||||
-eval "echo \"\$as_me:$LINENO: $ac_try_echo\"") >&5
|
||||
- (eval "$ac_compile") 2>conftest.er1
|
||||
- ac_status=$?
|
||||
- grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err
|
||||
- rm -f conftest.er1
|
||||
- cat conftest.err >&5
|
||||
- echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
|
||||
- (exit $ac_status); } && {
|
||||
- test -z "$ac_c_werror_flag" ||
|
||||
- test ! -s conftest.err
|
||||
- } && test -s conftest.$ac_objext; then
|
||||
- OPTIM="$OPTIM -fstack-protector"
|
||||
- { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5
|
||||
-echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6; }
|
||||
-else
|
||||
- echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5
|
||||
-sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5
|
||||
-
|
||||
- { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5
|
||||
-echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6; }
|
||||
-fi
|
||||
-
|
||||
-rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
|
||||
- CFLAGS="$OLDCFLAGS"
|
||||
-
|
||||
# The -pie option is available with some versions of GCC and adds
|
||||
# randomization of addresses, which avoids another class of exploits
|
||||
# that depend on a fixed address for common functions.
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user